EFEKTIVITAS HONEY DRESSING DALAM PENGOBATAN ULKUS KAKI DIABETIK : SEBUAH SCOPING REVIEW

  • Jamilah Department of Primary Care Family Medicine Specialist, Faculty of Medicine, YARSI University
  • Zwasta Pribadi Mahardika Department of Primary Care Family Medicine Specialist, Faculty of Medicine, YARSI University
  • Diana Batara Munti AnNasher Health College
  • Dian Mardiyah Department of Primary Care Family Medicine Specialist, Faculty of Medicine, YARSI University
Keywords: Honey dressing, ulkus kaki diabetik, penyembuhan luka, tinjauan sistematis

Abstract

Ulkus kaki diabetik merupakan komplikasi serius diabetes melitus yang memerlukan penanganan efektif. Madu telah lama digunakan dalam pengobatan luka, namun bukti ilmiah terkait efektivitasnya dalam penanganan ulkus kaki diabetik masih terbatas. Mengevaluasi efektivitas honey dressing dibandingkan dengan dressing konvensional dalam pengobatan ulkus kaki diabetik. Tinjauan sistematis dilakukan dengan pencarian pada database PubMed, Science Direct, dan Google Scholar. Kriteria inklusi meliputi uji klinis terkontrol acak yang membandingkan honey dressing dengan dressing konvensional pada pasien ulkus kaki diabetik, diterbitkan dalam bahasa Inggris antara 2010-2023. Dari 223 artikel yang diidentifikasi, lima studi memenuhi kriteria inklusi dengan total 580 pasien. Honey dressing menunjukkan tingkat penyembuhan yang lebih tinggi (rata-rata 79,8% vs 62,2%) dan waktu penyembuhan yang lebih cepat (rata-rata 31,8 hari vs 38,4 hari) dibandingkan dressing konvensional. Temuan ini mengindikasikan potensi honey dressing sebagai alternatif yang efektif dalam manajemen ulkus kaki diabetik. Penelitian lebih lanjut diperlukan untuk mengonfirmasi hasil ini dan mengevaluasi efektivitas jangka panjangnya.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Armstrong DG, Boulton AJM, Bus SA. Diabetic Foot Ulcers and Their Recurrence. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(24):2367-2375. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1615439

Molan P, Rhodes T. Honey: A Biologic Wound Dressing. Wounds Compend Clin Res Pract. 2015;27(6):141-151.

Jull AB, Cullum N, Dumville JC, Westby MJ, Deshpande S, Walker N. Honey as a topical treatment for wounds. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;2015(3):CD005083. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD005083.pub4

Imran M, Hussain MB, Baig M. A Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial of Honey-Impregnated Dressing for Treating Diabetic Foot Ulcer. J Coll Physicians Surg--Pak JCPSP. 2015;25(10):721-725. doi:10.2015/JCPSP.721725

Kamaratos AV, Tzirogiannis KN, Iraklianou SA, Panoutsopoulos GI, Kanellos IE, Melidonis AI. Manuka honey‐impregnated dressings in the treatment of neuropathic diabetic foot ulcers. Int Wound J. 2014;11(3):259-263. doi:10.1111/j.1742-481X.2012.01082.x

Shukrimi A, Sulaiman AR, Halim AY, Azril A. A comparative study between honey and povidone iodine as dressing solution for Wagner type II diabetic foot ulcers. Med J Malaysia. 2008;63(1):44-46.

Gulfraz M, Ifftikhar F, Asif S, et al. Quality assessment and antimicrobial activity of various honey types of Pakistan. Afr J Biotechnol. 2010;9(41):c-6906.

Tsang KK, Kwong EWY, To TSS, Chung JWY, Wong TKS. A Pilot Randomized, Controlled Study of Nanocrystalline Silver, Manuka Honey, and Conventional Dressing in Healing Diabetic Foot Ulcer. Ranzato E, ed. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2017;2017(1):5294890. doi:10.1155/2017/5294890

Eddy JJ, Gideonsen MD. Topical honey for diabetic foot ulcers. J Fam Pract. 2005;54(6):533-535.

Moghazy AM, Shams ME, Adly OA, et al. The clinical and cost effectiveness of bee honey dressing in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2010;89(3):276-281. doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2010.05.021

Molan PC. The evidence supporting the use of honey as a wound dressing. Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2006;5(1):40-54. doi:10.1177/1534734605286014

Majtan J. Honey: an immunomodulator in wound healing. Wound Repair Regen Off Publ Wound Heal Soc Eur Tissue Repair Soc. 2014;22(2):187-192. doi:10.1111/wrr.12117

Yaghoobi R, Kazerouni A, Kazerouni O. Evidence for Clinical Use of Honey in Wound Healing as an Anti-bacterial, Anti-inflammatory Anti-oxidant and Anti-viral Agent: A Review. Jundishapur J Nat Pharm Prod. 2013;8(3):100-104. doi:10.17795/jjnpp-9487

Gethin G, Cowman S. Manuka honey vs. hydrogel--a prospective, open label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial to compare desloughing efficacy and healing outcomes in venous ulcers. J Clin Nurs. 2009;18(3):466-474. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02558.x

Alam F, Islam MA, Gan SH, Khalil MI. Honey: a potential therapeutic agent for managing diabetic wounds. Evid-Based Complement Altern Med ECAM. 2014;2014:169130. doi:10.1155/2014/169130

Simon A, Sofka K, Wiszniewsky G, Blaser G, Bode U, Fleischhack G. Wound care with antibacterial honey (Medihoney) in pediatric hematology-oncology. Support Care Cancer Off J Multinatl Assoc Support Care Cancer. 2006;14(1):91-97. doi:10.1007/s00520-005-0874-8

Dryden M, Goddard C, Madadi A, Heard M, Saeed K, Cooke J. Using antimicrobial Surgihoney to prevent caesarean wound infection. Br J Midwifery. 2014;22(2):111-115. doi:10.12968/bjom.2014.22.2.111

Tian X, Yi LJ, Ma L, Zhang L, Song GM, Wang Y. Effects of honey dressing for the treatment of DFUs: A systematic review. Int J Nurs Sci. 2014;1(2):224-231. doi:10.1016/j.ijnss.2014.05.013

Zeleníková R, Vyhlídalová D. Applying honey dressings to non-healing wounds in elderly persons receiving home care. J Tissue Viability. 2019;28(3):139-143. doi:10.1016/j.jtv.2019.04.002

Munn Z, Peters MDJ, Stern C, Tufanaru C, McArthur A, Aromataris E. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018;18(1):143. doi:10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x

Bramer WM, de Jonge GB, Rethlefsen ML, Mast F, Kleijnen J. A systematic approach to searching: an efficient and complete method to develop literature searches. J Med Libr Assoc JMLA. 2018;106(4):531-541. doi:10.5195/jmla.2018.283

Muka T, Glisic M, Milic J, et al. A 24-step guide on how to design, conduct, and successfully publish a systematic review and meta-analysis in medical research. Eur J Epidemiol. 2020;35(1):49-60. doi:10.1007/s10654-019-00576-5

Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467-473. doi:10.7326/M18-0850

Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343(oct18 2):d5928-d5928. doi:10.1136/bmj.d5928

Wager E, Wiffen PJ. Ethical issues in preparing and publishing systematic reviews. J Evid-Based Med. 2011;4(2):130-134. doi:10.1111/j.1756-5391.2011.01122.x

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097

Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019;366:l4898. doi:10.1136/bmj.l4898

Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336(7650):924-926. doi:10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD

Shea BJ, Reeves BC, Wells G, et al. AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ. 2017;358:j4008. doi:10.1136/bmj.j4008

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. doi:10.1136/bmj.n71

Sadiq A, Shah A, Jeschke MG, et al. The Role of Serotonin during Skin Healing in Post-Thermal Injury. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(4):1034. doi:10.3390/ijms19041034

Oryan A, Alemzadeh E, Moshiri A. Biological properties and therapeutic activities of honey in wound healing: A narrative review and meta-analysis. J Tissue Viability. 2016;25(2):98-118. doi:10.1016/j.jtv.2015.12.002

Mandal MD, Mandal S. Honey: its medicinal property and antibacterial activity. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2011;1(2):154-160. doi:10.1016/S2221-1691(11)60016-6

Aziz Z, Abdul Rasool Hassan B. The effects of honey compared to silver sulfadiazine for the treatment of burns: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Burns J Int Soc Burn Inj. 2017;43(1):50-57. doi:10.1016/j.burns.2016.07.004

Saikaly SK, Khachemoune A. Honey and Wound Healing: An Update. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2017;18(2):237-251. doi:10.1007/s40257-016-0247-8

Maddocks SE, Jenkins RE. Honey: a sweet solution to the growing problem of antimicrobial resistance? Future Microbiol. 2013;8(11):1419-1429. doi:10.2217/fmb.13.105

McLoone P, Warnock M, Fyfe L. Honey: A realistic antimicrobial for disorders of the skin. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2016;49(2):161-167. doi:10.1016/j.jmii.2015.01.009

Carter DA, Blair SE, Cokcetin NN, et al. Therapeutic Manuka Honey: No Longer So Alternative. Front Microbiol. 2016;7. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.00569

Mavric E, Wittmann S, Barth G, Henle T. Identification and quantification of methylglyoxal as the dominant antibacterial constituent of Manuka (Leptospermum scoparium) honeys from New Zealand. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2008;52(4):483-489. doi:10.1002/mnfr.200700282

Published
2024-12-25
How to Cite
Jamilah, Zwasta Pribadi Mahardika, Diana Batara Munti, & Dian Mardiyah. (2024). EFEKTIVITAS HONEY DRESSING DALAM PENGOBATAN ULKUS KAKI DIABETIK : SEBUAH SCOPING REVIEW. Medika Alkhairaat: Jurnal Penelitian Kedokteran Dan Kesehatan, 6(3), 784-795. https://doi.org/10.31970/ma.v6i3.242
Section
Articles